Chronosphere vs Grafana Cloud
Chronosphere vs Grafana Cloud, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chronosphere is on 50/100 and Grafana Cloud on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Chronosphere
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Grafana Cloud
- our overall score: 69/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 89/100 against 70/100
- headcount: 1,842 against 148
- funding raised: $2.1B against $369M
- LinkedIn following: 285,029 against 22,052
At a glance
| Measure | Chronosphere | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Observability platform for cloud-native applications, focusing on reliability and performance. | Full-stack observability platform built on open standards for unifying telemetry and accelerating troubleshooting. |
| Category | Observability, MLOps, Data Platform, Analytics Platform | Observability, Monitoring, Data Visualization, Cloud Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chronosphere | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 148 | 1,842 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.3% |
| Total funding | $369M | $2.1B |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | $2 | $6.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,052 | 285,029 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chronosphere | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chronosphere | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Discourse |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Chronosphere vs Grafana Cloud: common questions
Which is better, Chronosphere or Grafana Cloud?
On our 0-100 score Grafana Cloud rates higher (69/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chronosphere and Grafana Cloud compare on the numbers?
Grafana Cloud leads on our overall score (69/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 47/100), domain rating (89/100 against 70/100), headcount (1,842 against 148), funding raised ($2.1B against $369M), LinkedIn following (285,029 against 22,052).
Read the full Chronosphere review and pricing or the Grafana Cloud review and pricing. You can also browse other Chronosphere alternatives we track.