Chronom vs Exabeam
Chronom vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chronom is on 46/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Chronom
- headcount growth: +48.5% against +2.8%
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 794 against 10
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 403
At a glance
| Measure | Chronom | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for cloud cost optimization, security governance, and operational efficiency. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Enterprise, Management, Information Technology (IT), Cloud Infrastructure | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chronom | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +48.5% | +2.8% |
| Total funding | Not published | $390M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 403 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chronom | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chronom | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Chronom vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, Chronom or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chronom and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
Chronom leads on headcount growth (+48.5% against +2.8%). Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 46/100), domain rating (76/100 against 39/100), headcount (794 against 10), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 403).
Read the full Chronom review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other Chronom alternatives we track.