Chroma vs Qdrant
Chroma vs Qdrant, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chroma is on 61/100 and Qdrant on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Chroma
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 51/100
Qdrant
- our overall score: 71/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 145 against 103
- funding raised: $96.5M against $20.3M
- LinkedIn following: 61,051 against 8,672
At a glance
| Measure | Chroma | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source AI-native vector database that makes knowledge and memory pluggable for LLM applications. | High-performance, open-source vector search engine built in Rust for production-grade AI and machine learning workloads. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, Vector Database, Open Source | Vector Database, Vector Search Engine, Open Source, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | Open Source / Cloud | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chroma | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 103 | 145 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +111.8% |
| Total funding | $20.3M | $96.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | $75.0M | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,672 | 61,051 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chroma | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 79/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chroma | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Netlify |
| CDN | Vercel | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Chroma vs Qdrant: common questions
Which is better, Chroma or Qdrant?
On our 0-100 score Qdrant rates higher (71/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chroma and Qdrant compare on the numbers?
Chroma leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 51/100). Qdrant leads on our overall score (71/100 against 61/100), headcount (145 against 103), funding raised ($96.5M against $20.3M), LinkedIn following (61,051 against 8,672).
Read the full Chroma review and pricing or the Qdrant review and pricing. You can also browse other Chroma alternatives we track.