Chiliz vs Thruball
Chiliz vs Thruball, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chiliz is on 54/100 and Thruball on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Chiliz
- our overall score: 54/100 against 7/100
Thruball
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 41/100
At a glance
| Measure | Chiliz | Thruball |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Blockchain fintech provider for sports and entertainment, powering the Socios.com fan engagement platform. | Thruball provides in-depth football analytics focusing on players, referees, and matchups beyond headline statistics for obsessive fans. |
| Category | Fintech, Sports Tech, Blockchain, Fan Engagement | Sports Tech, Football Analytics, Data Analytics, Consumer App |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Gzira, Malta | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chiliz | Thruball |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 244 | Not published |
| Total funding | $65.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Private Round | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,191 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chiliz | Thruball |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | Not published |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chiliz | Thruball |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Chiliz vs Thruball: common questions
Which is better, Chiliz or Thruball?
On our 0-100 score Chiliz rates higher (54/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chiliz and Thruball compare on the numbers?
Chiliz leads on our overall score (54/100 against 7/100). Thruball leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 41/100).
Read the full Chiliz review and pricing or the Thruball review and pricing. You can also browse other Chiliz alternatives we track.