CHEQ vs FingerprintJS
CHEQ vs FingerprintJS, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CHEQ is on 72/100 and FingerprintJS on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CHEQ
- our overall score: 72/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 44/100
- funding raised: $171M against $88.0M
FingerprintJS
- headcount growth: +58.3% against +14.9%
At a glance
| Measure | CHEQ | FingerprintJS |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CHEQ is the global leader in Go-to-Market Security, protecting marketing, revenue, and data operations from bots and fake users. | Device intelligence platform for fraud prevention, bot detection, and enhanced customer experiences. |
| Category | Marketing, Cybersecurity, Brand, Brand Safety | Customer Service, AI Agents, Cybersecurity, Fraud Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CHEQ | FingerprintJS |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 262 | 251 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.9% | +58.3% |
| Total funding | $171M | $88.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,412 | 33,861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CHEQ | FingerprintJS |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | 24/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 81/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CHEQ | FingerprintJS |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | CHEQ | FingerprintJS |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads |
“fingerprintjs. Identify visitors you can trust. And those you can’t. Over 6,000 companies trust Fingerprint’s highly accurate, real-time device intelligence.”r/
CHEQ vs FingerprintJS: common questions
Which is better, CHEQ or FingerprintJS?
On our 0-100 score CHEQ rates higher (72/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CHEQ and FingerprintJS compare on the numbers?
CHEQ leads on our overall score (72/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 44/100), funding raised ($171M against $88.0M). FingerprintJS leads on headcount growth (+58.3% against +14.9%).
What do real users say about CHEQ and FingerprintJS?
FingerprintJS: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full CHEQ review and pricing or the FingerprintJS review and pricing. You can also browse other CHEQ alternatives we track.