Checkr vs TraqCheck
Checkr vs TraqCheck, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Checkr is on 52/100 and TraqCheck on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Checkr
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 29/100
- funding raised: $680M against $8.0M
TraqCheck
- our overall score: 63/100 against 52/100
At a glance
| Measure | Checkr | TraqCheck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Identity verification and background check platform for hiring. | HRtech startup using autonomous AI agents to streamline talent acquisition and background screening. |
| Category | Human Resources, Identity Verification, Background Checks, AI | Human Resources, Artificial Intelligence, Recruitment Technology, HR Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Checkr | TraqCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 83 |
| Total funding | $680M | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,252 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Checkr | TraqCheck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Checkr | TraqCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Vercel |
| CDN | Netlify | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Checkr vs TraqCheck: common questions
Which is better, Checkr or TraqCheck?
On our 0-100 score TraqCheck rates higher (63/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Checkr and TraqCheck compare on the numbers?
Checkr leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 33/100), domain rating (78/100 against 29/100), funding raised ($680M against $8.0M). TraqCheck leads on our overall score (63/100 against 52/100).
Read the full Checkr review and pricing or the TraqCheck review and pricing. You can also browse other Checkr alternatives we track.