Checkr vs Fama
Checkr vs Fama, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Checkr is on 52/100 and Fama on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Checkr
- domain rating: 78/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $680M against $10.0M
Fama
- our overall score: 57/100 against 52/100
At a glance
| Measure | Checkr | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Identity verification and background check platform for hiring. | AI-powered platform for analyzing public online data for talent screening and risk mitigation. |
| Category | Human Resources, Identity Verification, Background Checks, AI | Talent Screening, HR Tech, Risk Management, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Checkr | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 79 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -26.2% |
| Total funding | $680M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 3,532 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Checkr | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Checkr | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Zendesk |
Checkr vs Fama: common questions
Which is better, Checkr or Fama?
On our 0-100 score Fama rates higher (57/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Checkr and Fama compare on the numbers?
Checkr leads on domain rating (78/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($680M against $10.0M). Fama leads on our overall score (57/100 against 52/100).
Read the full Checkr review and pricing or the Fama review and pricing. You can also browse other Checkr alternatives we track.