Checkmarx vs Bright Security
Checkmarx vs Bright Security, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Checkmarx is on 63/100 and Bright Security on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Checkmarx
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 65/100
- headcount: 1,005 against 110
- funding raised: $80.5M against $24.7M
- LinkedIn following: 128,709 against 15,132
Bright Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Checkmarx | Bright Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading application security provider with a comprehensive cloud-native platform for securing development lifecycles. | A powerful application and API security testing platform that integrates DAST scans into CI/CD pipelines. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, Application Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Detection, Prevention |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Checkmarx | Bright Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,005 | 110 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $80.5M | $24.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $120M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 128,709 | 15,132 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Checkmarx | Bright Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 65/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Checkmarx | Bright Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
Checkmarx vs Bright Security: common questions
Which is better, Checkmarx or Bright Security?
On our 0-100 score Checkmarx rates higher (63/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Checkmarx and Bright Security compare on the numbers?
Checkmarx leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 33/100), domain rating (77/100 against 65/100), headcount (1,005 against 110), funding raised ($80.5M against $24.7M), LinkedIn following (128,709 against 15,132).
Read the full Checkmarx review and pricing or the Bright Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Checkmarx alternatives we track.