Checkmarx vs CloudEssence
Checkmarx vs CloudEssence, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Checkmarx is on 63/100 and CloudEssence on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Checkmarx
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 1,005 against 10
CloudEssence
- funding raised: $310M against $80.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Checkmarx | CloudEssence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading application security provider with a comprehensive cloud-native platform for securing development lifecycles. | Automates application security testing within DevOps pipelines for developers. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, Application Security | DevOps, Cybersecurity, Testing, DevSecOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Los Altos, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Checkmarx | CloudEssence |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,005 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $80.5M | $310M |
| Latest round | Series C | Debt |
| Valuation | $120M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 128,709 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Checkmarx | CloudEssence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Checkmarx | CloudEssence |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
Checkmarx vs CloudEssence: common questions
Which is better, Checkmarx or CloudEssence?
On our 0-100 score Checkmarx rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Checkmarx and CloudEssence compare on the numbers?
Checkmarx leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 33/100), headcount (1,005 against 10). CloudEssence leads on funding raised ($310M against $80.5M).
Read the full Checkmarx review and pricing or the CloudEssence review and pricing. You can also browse other Checkmarx alternatives we track.