Chartboost vs StackAdapt
Chartboost vs StackAdapt, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chartboost is on 56/100 and StackAdapt on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Chartboost
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 52/100
StackAdapt
- our overall score: 67/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 1,707 against 437
At a glance
| Measure | Chartboost | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | In-app monetization and programmatic advertising platform for mobile game developers. | A leading multi-channel programmatic advertising platform powered by AI and automation. |
| Category | AdTech, Mobile Advertising, Programmatic Advertising, Monetization Platform | AdTech, MarTech, Programmatic Advertising, Demand-Side Platform (DSP) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Toronto, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chartboost | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 437 | 1,707 |
| Total funding | Not published | $535M |
| Latest round | Not published | Growth |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,815 | 78,144 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chartboost | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chartboost | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Chartboost vs StackAdapt: common questions
Which is better, Chartboost or StackAdapt?
On our 0-100 score StackAdapt rates higher (67/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chartboost and StackAdapt compare on the numbers?
Chartboost leads on agent readiness (67/100 against 52/100). StackAdapt leads on our overall score (67/100 against 56/100), headcount (1,707 against 437).
Read the full Chartboost review and pricing or the StackAdapt review and pricing. You can also browse other Chartboost alternatives we track.