Chartboost vs Inneractive
Chartboost vs Inneractive, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chartboost is on 56/100 and Inneractive on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Chartboost
- our overall score: 56/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 437 against 10
- LinkedIn following: 75,815 against 3,807
Inneractive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Chartboost | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | In-app monetization and programmatic advertising platform for mobile game developers. | Inneractive was a mobile ad exchange and monetization platform for app developers and publishers, acquired by Fyber in 2016. |
| Category | AdTech, Mobile Advertising, Programmatic Advertising, Monetization Platform | Mobile, Monetization, App, Advertising |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chartboost | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 437 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $11.8M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,815 | 3,807 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chartboost | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chartboost | Inneractive |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Chartboost vs Inneractive: common questions
Which is better, Chartboost or Inneractive?
On our 0-100 score Chartboost rates higher (56/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chartboost and Inneractive compare on the numbers?
Chartboost leads on our overall score (56/100 against 44/100), headcount (437 against 10), LinkedIn following (75,815 against 3,807).
Read the full Chartboost review and pricing or the Inneractive review and pricing. You can also browse other Chartboost alternatives we track.