Chartboost vs FireArc
Chartboost vs FireArc, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chartboost is on 56/100 and FireArc on 22/100.
Where each one leads
Chartboost
- our overall score: 56/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 437 against 72
- LinkedIn following: 75,815 against 6,356
FireArc
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Chartboost | FireArc |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | In-app monetization and programmatic advertising platform for mobile game developers. | Digital asset and product company specializing in ad monetization and gaming, developing a multi-platform ecosystem of digital assets. |
| Category | AdTech, Mobile Advertising, Programmatic Advertising, Monetization Platform | AdTech, Digital Assets, Gaming, Monetization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chartboost | FireArc |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 437 | 72 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -5.4% |
| Latest round | Not published | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,815 | 6,356 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chartboost | FireArc |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 22/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 19/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 19/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chartboost | FireArc |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Jetpack Stats |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Chartboost vs FireArc: common questions
Which is better, Chartboost or FireArc?
On our 0-100 score Chartboost rates higher (56/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chartboost and FireArc compare on the numbers?
Chartboost leads on our overall score (56/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (67/100 against 38/100), domain rating (73/100 against 19/100), headcount (437 against 72), LinkedIn following (75,815 against 6,356).
Read the full Chartboost review and pricing or the FireArc review and pricing. You can also browse other Chartboost alternatives we track.