ChargePoint vs Co-Power
ChargePoint vs Co-Power, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ChargePoint is on 62/100 and Co-Power on 37/100.
Where each one leads
ChargePoint
- our overall score: 62/100 against 37/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 31/100
- funding raised: $1.8B against $12.8M
Co-Power
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ChargePoint | Co-Power |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ChargePoint is a leading provider of networked electric vehicle charging solutions, operating the largest EV charging network globally. | Co-Power provides a platform for managing and optimizing renewable energy assets, focusing on grid services and energy trading. |
| Category | Electric Vehicle Infrastructure, EV Charging, Energy Tech, Hardware | Energy Tech, Climate Tech, Grid Services, Renewable Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2007 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Campbell, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ChargePoint | Co-Power |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,522 | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.8B | $12.8M |
| Latest round | ATM | Not published |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 144,721 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ChargePoint | Co-Power |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 37/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ChargePoint | Co-Power |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
ChargePoint vs Co-Power: common questions
Which is better, ChargePoint or Co-Power?
On our 0-100 score ChargePoint rates higher (62/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ChargePoint and Co-Power compare on the numbers?
ChargePoint leads on our overall score (62/100 against 37/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($1.8B against $12.8M).
Read the full ChargePoint review and pricing or the Co-Power review and pricing. You can also browse other ChargePoint alternatives we track.