ChainSafe Systems vs Immutable X
ChainSafe Systems vs Immutable X, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ChainSafe Systems is on 57/100 and Immutable X on 66/100.
Where each one leads
ChainSafe Systems
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Immutable X
- our overall score: 66/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 65/100
- headcount: 213 against 62
- funding raised: $62.4M against $18.8M
- LinkedIn following: 56,539 against 4,530
At a glance
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading Web3 infrastructure firm specializing in protocol engineering, cross-chain interoperability, and Web3 gaming. | A Layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering gas-free minting and trading. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Protocol Engineering | Web3, Blockchain, NFT, DeFi |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Melbourne, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 62 | 213 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $18.8M | $62.4M |
| Latest round | Series A | ICO |
| Valuation | $64.0M | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,530 | 56,539 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Plausible | PostHog |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ChainSafe Systems vs Immutable X: common questions
Which is better, ChainSafe Systems or Immutable X?
On our 0-100 score Immutable X rates higher (66/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ChainSafe Systems and Immutable X compare on the numbers?
Immutable X leads on our overall score (66/100 against 57/100), domain rating (74/100 against 65/100), headcount (213 against 62), funding raised ($62.4M against $18.8M), LinkedIn following (56,539 against 4,530).
Read the full ChainSafe Systems review and pricing or the Immutable X review and pricing. You can also browse other ChainSafe Systems alternatives we track.