ChainSafe Systems vs CyVers
ChainSafe Systems vs CyVers, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ChainSafe Systems is on 57/100 and CyVers on 55/100.
Where each one leads
ChainSafe Systems
- domain rating: 65/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 62 against 37
- funding raised: $18.8M against $9.0M
CyVers
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 45/100
- headcount growth: +13.2% against -26.3%
At a glance
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading Web3 infrastructure firm specializing in protocol engineering, cross-chain interoperability, and Web3 gaming. | Web3 attack remediation platform using geometric machine learning for real-time cryptocurrency attack detection. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Protocol Engineering | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 62 | 37 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.3% | +13.2% |
| Total funding | $18.8M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | $64.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,530 | 5,336 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Render |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Base44 |
| Analytics | Plausible | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ChainSafe Systems vs CyVers: common questions
Which is better, ChainSafe Systems or CyVers?
On our 0-100 score ChainSafe Systems rates higher (57/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ChainSafe Systems and CyVers compare on the numbers?
ChainSafe Systems leads on domain rating (65/100 against 38/100), headcount (62 against 37), funding raised ($18.8M against $9.0M). CyVers leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 45/100), headcount growth (+13.2% against -26.3%).
Read the full ChainSafe Systems review and pricing or the CyVers review and pricing. You can also browse other ChainSafe Systems alternatives we track.