ChainSafe Systems vs ConsenSys (Infura)
ChainSafe Systems vs ConsenSys (Infura), compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ChainSafe Systems is on 57/100 and ConsenSys (Infura) on 52/100.
Where each one leads
ChainSafe Systems
- our overall score: 57/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 62 against 15
ConsenSys (Infura)
- domain rating: 77/100 against 65/100
- funding raised: $221M against $18.8M
- LinkedIn following: 7,676 against 4,530
At a glance
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | ConsenSys (Infura) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading Web3 infrastructure firm specializing in protocol engineering, cross-chain interoperability, and Web3 gaming. | Infura provides developers with access to Ethereum and other blockchain networks. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Protocol Engineering | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | ConsenSys (Infura) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 62 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $18.8M | $221M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | $64.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,530 | 7,676 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | ConsenSys (Infura) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ChainSafe Systems | ConsenSys (Infura) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Plausible | Not detected |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Crypto Payments |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ChainSafe Systems vs ConsenSys (Infura): common questions
Which is better, ChainSafe Systems or ConsenSys (Infura)?
On our 0-100 score ChainSafe Systems rates higher (57/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ChainSafe Systems and ConsenSys (Infura) compare on the numbers?
ChainSafe Systems leads on our overall score (57/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 37/100), headcount (62 against 15). ConsenSys (Infura) leads on domain rating (77/100 against 65/100), funding raised ($221M against $18.8M), LinkedIn following (7,676 against 4,530).
Read the full ChainSafe Systems review and pricing or the ConsenSys (Infura) review and pricing. You can also browse other ChainSafe Systems alternatives we track.