Chainguard vs Eclypsium
Chainguard vs Eclypsium, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chainguard is on 62/100 and Eclypsium on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Chainguard
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $385M against $25.0M
Eclypsium
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Chainguard | Eclypsium |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Secures the software supply chain with verifiable builds and open-source security tooling. | Securing the IT infrastructure supply chain. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Software Supply Chain Security, DevSecOps, Open Source | Cybersecurity, Information Technology, Hardware Security, Software Supply Chain Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | Portland, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chainguard | Eclypsium |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 701 | Not published |
| Total funding | $385M | $25.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Strategic Investment |
| Valuation | $2K | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,843 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chainguard | Eclypsium |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 11/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chainguard | Eclypsium |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Chainguard vs Eclypsium: common questions
Which is better, Chainguard or Eclypsium?
On our 0-100 score Chainguard rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chainguard and Eclypsium compare on the numbers?
Chainguard leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($385M against $25.0M). Eclypsium leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Chainguard review and pricing or the Eclypsium review and pricing. You can also browse other Chainguard alternatives we track.