Chainalysis vs Tres.finance
Chainalysis vs Tres.finance, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Chainalysis is on 64/100 and Tres.finance on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Chainalysis
- our overall score: 64/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 769 against 62
- funding raised: $170M against $18.6M
Tres.finance
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Chainalysis | Tres.finance |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Blockchain data platform providing compliance, investigation, and risk management software for global institutions and governments. | Enterprise-grade Web3 financial data lake and management platform for finance teams. |
| Category | Fintech, Blockchain, Cybersecurity, SaaS | Fintech, Web3, Tax, Accounting |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Chainalysis | Tres.finance |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 769 | 62 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +51.0% |
| Total funding | $170M | $18.6M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $8.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,347 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Chainalysis | Tres.finance |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Chainalysis | Tres.finance |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Chainalysis vs Tres.finance: common questions
Which is better, Chainalysis or Tres.finance?
On our 0-100 score Chainalysis rates higher (64/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Chainalysis and Tres.finance compare on the numbers?
Chainalysis leads on our overall score (64/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 37/100), domain rating (83/100 against 43/100), headcount (769 against 62), funding raised ($170M against $18.6M).
Read the full Chainalysis review and pricing or the Tres.finance review and pricing. You can also browse other Chainalysis alternatives we track.