CGTrader vs Stratasys
CGTrader vs Stratasys, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CGTrader is on 46/100 and Stratasys on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CGTrader
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Stratasys
- our overall score: 53/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 1,994 against 499
- LinkedIn following: 114,432 against 16,278
At a glance
| Measure | CGTrader | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global marketplace for 3D models, offering a vast library for designers and developers. | Global leader in additive technology solutions for diverse industries, focusing on customer business requirements. |
| Category | 3D Printing, Marketplace, 3D Modeling, Game Development | 3D Printing, Additive Manufacturing, Industrial Automation, Aerospace |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Marketplace | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 1989 |
| Headquarters | Vilnius, Lithuania | Eden Prairie, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CGTrader | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 499 | 1,994 |
| Total funding | Not published | $128M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,278 | 114,432 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CGTrader | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CGTrader | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | CGTrader | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 3 negative across 5 threads |
“Spent the last 6 months or so gutting this old Stratasys and replacing everything from the control boards to the print heads. Currently sporting dual water cooled hotends with a lifting support printhead both capable of 500+C, a 1000W verti”r/3Dprinting
CGTrader vs Stratasys: common questions
Which is better, CGTrader or Stratasys?
On our 0-100 score Stratasys rates higher (53/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CGTrader and Stratasys compare on the numbers?
Stratasys leads on our overall score (53/100 against 46/100), headcount (1,994 against 499), LinkedIn following (114,432 against 16,278).
What do real users say about CGTrader and Stratasys?
Stratasys: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/3Dprinting.
Read the full CGTrader review and pricing or the Stratasys review and pricing. You can also browse other CGTrader alternatives we track.