CGI vs Matrix
CGI vs Matrix, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CGI is on 43/100 and Matrix on 31/100.
Where each one leads
CGI
- our overall score: 43/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 70,414 against 7,071
- LinkedIn following: 1,967,888 against 113,294
Matrix
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +6.6% against -3.2%
At a glance
| Measure | CGI | Matrix |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global IT and business consulting firm providing end-to-end digital transformation and managed services. | Leading Israeli IT and software solutions provider for enterprises and organizations. |
| Category | IT Services, Business Consulting, Digital Transformation, Managed IT Services | IT Services, Software Development, Digital Transformation, Cloud Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1976 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Montreal, Canada | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CGI | Matrix |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 70,414 | 7,071 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.2% | +6.6% |
| Total funding | $3.3B | Not published |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,967,888 | 113,294 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CGI | Matrix |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 31/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CGI | Matrix |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
CGI vs Matrix: common questions
Which is better, CGI or Matrix?
On our 0-100 score CGI rates higher (43/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CGI and Matrix compare on the numbers?
CGI leads on our overall score (43/100 against 31/100), domain rating (82/100 against 42/100), headcount (70,414 against 7,071), LinkedIn following (1,967,888 against 113,294). Matrix leads on agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+6.6% against -3.2%).
Read the full CGI review and pricing or the Matrix review and pricing. You can also browse other CGI alternatives we track.