CGI vs Interlink Labs
CGI vs Interlink Labs, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CGI is on 43/100 and Interlink Labs on 28/100.
Where each one leads
CGI
- our overall score: 43/100 against 28/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 70,414 against 67
- LinkedIn following: 1,967,888 against 4,273
Interlink Labs
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | CGI | Interlink Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global IT and business consulting firm providing end-to-end digital transformation and managed services. | Cincinnati-based leading System Integrator for Microsoft. |
| Category | IT Services, Business Consulting, Digital Transformation, Managed IT Services | System Integrator, Microsoft Ecosystem, IT Services, Cloud Integration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1976 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Montreal, Canada | Cincinnati, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CGI | Interlink Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 70,414 | 67 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $3.3B | Not published |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,967,888 | 4,273 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CGI | Interlink Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 28/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 18/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CGI | Interlink Labs |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
CGI vs Interlink Labs: common questions
Which is better, CGI or Interlink Labs?
On our 0-100 score CGI rates higher (43/100 against 28/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CGI and Interlink Labs compare on the numbers?
CGI leads on our overall score (43/100 against 28/100), domain rating (82/100 against 42/100), headcount (70,414 against 67), LinkedIn following (1,967,888 against 4,273). Interlink Labs leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100).
Read the full CGI review and pricing or the Interlink Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other CGI alternatives we track.