CEVA vs GF (GlobalFoundries)
CEVA vs GF (GlobalFoundries), compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CEVA is on 55/100 and GF (GlobalFoundries) on 67/100.
Where each one leads
CEVA
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
GF (GlobalFoundries)
- our overall score: 67/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 13,500 against 528
- funding raised: $3.3B against $48.1M
- LinkedIn following: 306,908 against 22,260
At a glance
| Measure | CEVA | GF (GlobalFoundries) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Licensor of silicon and software IP for smart edge devices, focusing on connectivity and AI processors. | A leading semiconductor manufacturer providing advanced chip manufacturing services. |
| Category | Semiconductor, IP Licensing, Edge AI, Wireless Connectivity | Semiconductor, Chip Design, AI Hardware, AI Chip |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2002 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Rockville, United States | Malta, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CEVA | GF (GlobalFoundries) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 528 | 13,500 |
| Total funding | $48.1M | $3.3B |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Federal Funding |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,260 | 306,908 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CEVA | GF (GlobalFoundries) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CEVA | GF (GlobalFoundries) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Apple PAY |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
CEVA vs GF (GlobalFoundries): common questions
Which is better, CEVA or GF (GlobalFoundries)?
On our 0-100 score GF (GlobalFoundries) rates higher (67/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CEVA and GF (GlobalFoundries) compare on the numbers?
GF (GlobalFoundries) leads on our overall score (67/100 against 55/100), domain rating (73/100 against 60/100), headcount (13,500 against 528), funding raised ($3.3B against $48.1M), LinkedIn following (306,908 against 22,260).
Read the full CEVA review and pricing or the GF (GlobalFoundries) review and pricing. You can also browse other CEVA alternatives we track.