CEVA vs Diamond Quanta
CEVA vs Diamond Quanta, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CEVA is on 55/100 and Diamond Quanta on 46/100.
Where each one leads
CEVA
- our overall score: 55/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 528 against 3
- LinkedIn following: 22,260 against 587
Diamond Quanta
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CEVA | Diamond Quanta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Licensor of silicon and software IP for smart edge devices, focusing on connectivity and AI processors. | Pioneering a scalable engineered diamond platform for advanced coatings, substrates, and active devices. |
| Category | Semiconductor, IP Licensing, Edge AI, Wireless Connectivity | Advanced Manufacturing and Materials, Semiconductor, Materials Science, Nanotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2002 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Rockville, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CEVA | Diamond Quanta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 528 | 3 |
| Total funding | $48.1M | Not published |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,260 | 587 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CEVA | Diamond Quanta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 12/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 50/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CEVA | Diamond Quanta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CEVA vs Diamond Quanta: common questions
Which is better, CEVA or Diamond Quanta?
On our 0-100 score CEVA rates higher (55/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CEVA and Diamond Quanta compare on the numbers?
CEVA leads on our overall score (55/100 against 46/100), domain rating (60/100 against 22/100), headcount (528 against 3), LinkedIn following (22,260 against 587).
Read the full CEVA review and pricing or the Diamond Quanta review and pricing. You can also browse other CEVA alternatives we track.