CertiK vs Cyberscope
CertiK vs Cyberscope, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CertiK is on 56/100 and Cyberscope on 16/100.
Where each one leads
CertiK
- our overall score: 56/100 against 16/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 70/100
- headcount: 203 against 28
- LinkedIn following: 27,877 against 7,351
Cyberscope
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CertiK | Cyberscope |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Blockchain security and auditing firm providing smart contract auditing, KYC, and security tools. | Institutional-grade security solutions for Web3 ecosystems, integrating audits, monitoring, and compliance. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Smart Contract Auditing | Cybersecurity, Web3, Blockchain, DeFi |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CertiK | Cyberscope |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 203 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +313.6% |
| Open roles | Not published | 4 |
| Total funding | $242M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,877 | 7,351 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CertiK | Cyberscope |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 16/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 14/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CertiK | Cyberscope |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Walletconnect | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
CertiK vs Cyberscope: common questions
Which is better, CertiK or Cyberscope?
On our 0-100 score CertiK rates higher (56/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CertiK and Cyberscope compare on the numbers?
CertiK leads on our overall score (56/100 against 16/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 36/100), domain rating (79/100 against 70/100), headcount (203 against 28), LinkedIn following (27,877 against 7,351).
Read the full CertiK review and pricing or the Cyberscope review and pricing. You can also browse other CertiK alternatives we track.