Cerillion vs Paddle
Cerillion vs Paddle, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cerillion is on 55/100 and Paddle on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Cerillion
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Paddle
- our overall score: 67/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 401 against 300
- funding raised: $318M against $9.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cerillion | Paddle |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides BSS/OSS software solutions for telecommunications, finance, and utilities, enabling digital transformation and revenue management. | Paddle is a comprehensive payments, tax, and subscription solution for SaaS companies. |
| Category | Telecommunications Software, Billing Systems, Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Business Support Systems (BSS) | Fintech, Payments, SaaS, Merchant of Record |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | SaaS | Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cerillion | Paddle |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 300 | 401 |
| Total funding | $9.0M | $318M |
| Latest round | Series A | Conventional Debt |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 63,217 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cerillion | Paddle |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cerillion | Paddle |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cerillion vs Paddle: common questions
Which is better, Cerillion or Paddle?
On our 0-100 score Paddle rates higher (67/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cerillion and Paddle compare on the numbers?
Paddle leads on our overall score (67/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (56/100 against 46/100), domain rating (90/100 against 41/100), headcount (401 against 300), funding raised ($318M against $9.0M).
Read the full Cerillion review and pricing or the Paddle review and pricing. You can also browse other Cerillion alternatives we track.