Cerillion vs Chargebee
Cerillion vs Chargebee, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cerillion is on 55/100 and Chargebee on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Cerillion
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Chargebee
- our overall score: 69/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 1,250 against 300
- funding raised: $303M against $9.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cerillion | Chargebee |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides BSS/OSS software solutions for telecommunications, finance, and utilities, enabling digital transformation and revenue management. | Subscription management and recurring billing platform for SaaS and e-commerce businesses. |
| Category | Telecommunications Software, Billing Systems, Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Business Support Systems (BSS) | Fintech, Payments, Subscription Management, Revenue Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | SaaS | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Chennai, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cerillion | Chargebee |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 300 | 1,250 |
| Total funding | $9.0M | $303M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series H |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 571,113 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cerillion | Chargebee |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 81/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | C (63/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cerillion | Chargebee |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Freshdesk |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cerillion vs Chargebee: common questions
Which is better, Cerillion or Chargebee?
On our 0-100 score Chargebee rates higher (69/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cerillion and Chargebee compare on the numbers?
Chargebee leads on our overall score (69/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (63/100 against 46/100), domain rating (82/100 against 41/100), headcount (1,250 against 300), funding raised ($303M against $9.0M).
Read the full Cerillion review and pricing or the Chargebee review and pricing. You can also browse other Cerillion alternatives we track.