Ceribell vs Neuroscreen
Ceribell vs Neuroscreen, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ceribell is on 58/100 and Neuroscreen on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Ceribell
- our overall score: 58/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 21/100
Neuroscreen
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Ceribell | Neuroscreen |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered EEG device for rapid seizure detection in critical care. | Neuroscreen develops AI-powered tools for early detection and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials | MedTech, HealthTech, Neurotech, AI Drug Discovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Grays, England |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ceribell | Neuroscreen |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 397 | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,218 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ceribell | Neuroscreen |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ceribell | Neuroscreen |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Ceribell vs Neuroscreen: common questions
Which is better, Ceribell or Neuroscreen?
On our 0-100 score Ceribell rates higher (58/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ceribell and Neuroscreen compare on the numbers?
Ceribell leads on our overall score (58/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Ceribell review and pricing or the Neuroscreen review and pricing. You can also browse other Ceribell alternatives we track.