Ceribell vs mediQ
Ceribell vs mediQ, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ceribell is on 58/100 and mediQ on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Ceribell
- our overall score: 58/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 38/100
mediQ
- headcount: 1,372 against 397
- funding raised: $7.8M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Ceribell | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered EEG device for rapid seizure detection in critical care. | Global healthcare and homecare partner providing medical devices, products, and innovative solutions. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Homecare |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Utrecht, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ceribell | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 397 | 1,372 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -11.1% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $7.8M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,218 | 30,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ceribell | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ceribell | mediQ |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Ceribell vs mediQ: common questions
Which is better, Ceribell or mediQ?
On our 0-100 score Ceribell rates higher (58/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ceribell and mediQ compare on the numbers?
Ceribell leads on our overall score (58/100 against 54/100), domain rating (50/100 against 38/100). mediQ leads on headcount (1,372 against 397), funding raised ($7.8M against $1.0M).
Read the full Ceribell review and pricing or the mediQ review and pricing. You can also browse other Ceribell alternatives we track.