Ceribell vs Kernel
Ceribell vs Kernel, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ceribell is on 58/100 and Kernel on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Ceribell
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 397 against 55
Kernel
- domain rating: 56/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $152M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Ceribell | Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered EEG device for rapid seizure detection in critical care. | Non-invasive brain measurement technology for accessible brain health insights. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials | Neurotech & HCI, Brain-Computer Interface, Non-Invasive BCI, Neural Read/Write |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, software, services |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Los Angeles, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ceribell | Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 397 | 55 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $152M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,218 | 26,247 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ceribell | Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 45/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ceribell | Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
Ceribell vs Kernel: common questions
Which is better, Ceribell or Kernel?
On our 0-100 score Ceribell rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ceribell and Kernel compare on the numbers?
Ceribell leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 22/100), headcount (397 against 55). Kernel leads on domain rating (56/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($152M against $1.0M).
Read the full Ceribell review and pricing or the Kernel review and pricing. You can also browse other Ceribell alternatives we track.