Ceribell vs Francis Medical
Ceribell vs Francis Medical, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ceribell is on 58/100 and Francis Medical on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Ceribell
- our overall score: 58/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 397 against 71
Francis Medical
- funding raised: $156M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Ceribell | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered EEG device for rapid seizure detection in critical care. | Developing minimally invasive water vapor ablation therapy to treat prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials | MedTech, Urology, Oncology, Medical Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Maple Grove, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ceribell | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 397 | 71 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $156M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,218 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ceribell | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ceribell | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
Ceribell vs Francis Medical: common questions
Which is better, Ceribell or Francis Medical?
On our 0-100 score Ceribell rates higher (58/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ceribell and Francis Medical compare on the numbers?
Ceribell leads on our overall score (58/100 against 51/100), domain rating (50/100 against 27/100), headcount (397 against 71). Francis Medical leads on funding raised ($156M against $1.0M).
Read the full Ceribell review and pricing or the Francis Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other Ceribell alternatives we track.