Ceribell vs Empatica
Ceribell vs Empatica, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ceribell is on 58/100 and Empatica on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Ceribell
- headcount: 397 against 122
Empatica
- our overall score: 64/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $170M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 42,805 against 25,218
At a glance
| Measure | Ceribell | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered EEG device for rapid seizure detection in critical care. | Wearable devices and AI for continuous health monitoring and early disease detection. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Neurotech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware | software | platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ceribell | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 397 | 122 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $170M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,218 | 42,805 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ceribell | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 83/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ceribell | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Ceribell vs Empatica: common questions
Which is better, Ceribell or Empatica?
On our 0-100 score Empatica rates higher (64/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ceribell and Empatica compare on the numbers?
Ceribell leads on headcount (397 against 122). Empatica leads on our overall score (64/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 41/100), domain rating (62/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($170M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (42,805 against 25,218).
Read the full Ceribell review and pricing or the Empatica review and pricing. You can also browse other Ceribell alternatives we track.