Celtra vs DoubleVerify
Celtra vs DoubleVerify, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Celtra is on 62/100 and DoubleVerify on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Celtra
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
DoubleVerify
- our overall score: 69/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 1,353 against 208
- LinkedIn following: 80,882 against 18,526
At a glance
| Measure | Celtra | DoubleVerify |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Creative automation platform for digital advertising, enabling scalable ad production and performance. | DoubleVerify is a leading software platform for digital media measurement and analytics, ensuring brand safety, suitability, and performance for advertisers. |
| Category | AdTech, Creative Automation, Digital Advertising, Marketing Technology | Ad Fraud, Brand Safety, Advertising, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Mansfield, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Celtra | DoubleVerify |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 208 | 1,353 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +14.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $547M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $200M |
| LinkedIn followers | 18,526 | 80,882 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Celtra | DoubleVerify |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Celtra | DoubleVerify |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Celtra | DoubleVerify |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads |
“DoubleVerify Expands DV Authentic AdVantage to Meta and TikTok, an AI-Powered Solution to Optimize Media Quality and Performance.”r/Quantisnow
Celtra vs DoubleVerify: common questions
Which is better, Celtra or DoubleVerify?
On our 0-100 score DoubleVerify rates higher (69/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Celtra and DoubleVerify compare on the numbers?
DoubleVerify leads on our overall score (69/100 against 62/100), headcount (1,353 against 208), LinkedIn following (80,882 against 18,526).
What do real users say about Celtra and DoubleVerify?
DoubleVerify: 2 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow.
Read the full Celtra review and pricing or the DoubleVerify review and pricing. You can also browse other Celtra alternatives we track.