Celsius vs StarkWare
Celsius vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Celsius is on 50/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Celsius
- agent readiness: 34/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $769M against $180M
- LinkedIn following: 38,586 against 20,607
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 194 against 119
- headcount growth: +15.6% against -17.6%
At a glance
| Measure | Celsius | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Crypto lending platform offering interest on deposits and loans against crypto assets. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Fintech | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Celsius | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 119 | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -17.6% | +15.6% |
| Total funding | $769M | $180M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | $3.5B | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 38,586 | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Celsius | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Celsius | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Celsius vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Celsius or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Celsius and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
Celsius leads on agent readiness (34/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($769M against $180M), LinkedIn following (38,586 against 20,607). StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 50/100), headcount (194 against 119), headcount growth (+15.6% against -17.6%).
Read the full Celsius review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Celsius alternatives we track.