Celsius vs Fireblocks
Celsius vs Fireblocks, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Celsius is on 50/100 and Fireblocks on 74/100.
Where each one leads
Celsius
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Fireblocks
- our overall score: 74/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 66/100
- headcount: 663 against 119
- headcount growth: +17.9% against -17.6%
- funding raised: $1.0B against $769M
- LinkedIn following: 60,117 against 38,586
At a glance
| Measure | Celsius | Fireblocks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Crypto lending platform offering interest on deposits and loans against crypto assets. | Enterprise digital asset infrastructure platform enabling banks, exchanges, and fintechs to securely custody, transfer, tokenize, and settle digital assets at institutional scale. |
| Category | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Fintech | Blockchain, Digital Assets, Fintech, Crypto Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Celsius | Fireblocks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 119 | 663 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -17.6% | +17.9% |
| Total funding | $769M | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Series B | Series E |
| Valuation | $3.5B | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 38,586 | 60,117 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Celsius | Fireblocks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 74/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Celsius | Fireblocks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Celsius vs Fireblocks: common questions
Which is better, Celsius or Fireblocks?
On our 0-100 score Fireblocks rates higher (74/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Celsius and Fireblocks compare on the numbers?
Fireblocks leads on our overall score (74/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 34/100), domain rating (76/100 against 66/100), headcount (663 against 119), headcount growth (+17.9% against -17.6%), funding raised ($1.0B against $769M), LinkedIn following (60,117 against 38,586).
Read the full Celsius review and pricing or the Fireblocks review and pricing. You can also browse other Celsius alternatives we track.