Celsius Holdings vs Waterloo Sparkling Water
Celsius Holdings vs Waterloo Sparkling Water, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Celsius Holdings is on 24/100 and Waterloo Sparkling Water on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Celsius Holdings
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $665M against $17.2M
Waterloo Sparkling Water
- our overall score: 55/100 against 24/100
At a glance
| Measure | Celsius Holdings | Waterloo Sparkling Water |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Functional beverage company offering a range of energy drinks and supplements. | Authentically flavored sparkling water with zero calories, sugar, or sweeteners. |
| Category | Beverages, Consumer Goods, Health and Wellness, Functional Foods | Beverages, Food & Beverage, Sparkling Water, Healthy Lifestyle |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Consumer packaged goods | Software | hardware | services | marketplace | platform |
| Founded | 2004 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Boca Raton, United States | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Celsius Holdings | Waterloo Sparkling Water |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $665M | $17.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Conventional Debt |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Celsius Holdings | Waterloo Sparkling Water |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 24/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Celsius Holdings | Waterloo Sparkling Water |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Shopify |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Celsius Holdings vs Waterloo Sparkling Water: common questions
Which is better, Celsius Holdings or Waterloo Sparkling Water?
On our 0-100 score Waterloo Sparkling Water rates higher (55/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Celsius Holdings and Waterloo Sparkling Water compare on the numbers?
Celsius Holdings leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100), domain rating (71/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($665M against $17.2M). Waterloo Sparkling Water leads on our overall score (55/100 against 24/100).
Read the full Celsius Holdings review and pricing or the Waterloo Sparkling Water review and pricing. You can also browse other Celsius Holdings alternatives we track.