Celonis vs Skan
Celonis vs Skan, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Celonis is on 65/100 and Skan on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Celonis
- domain rating: 76/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 3,852 against 266
- LinkedIn following: 338,028 against 113,623
Skan
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | Celonis | Skan |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Celonis provides a Process Intelligence Platform leveraging process mining and AI to create a living digital twin of business operations. | Skan.ai provides a process intelligence platform that uses computer vision and AI to map and analyze business processes. |
| Category | Process Intelligence, Process Mining, Business Process Management, Digital Twin | Process Intelligence, Process Mining, Business Process Management, Computer Vision |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Munich, Germany | Menlo Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Celonis | Skan |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,852 | 266 |
| Total funding | Not published | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | $13B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 338,028 | 113,623 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Celonis | Skan |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 63/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 84/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Celonis | Skan |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Celonis | Skan |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Process Intelligence Platform, AI Development & AgentC, Process Analysis & Improvement, Ecosystem & Marketplace, Value Realization | Not published |
Celonis vs Skan: common questions
Which is better, Celonis or Skan?
On our 0-100 score Celonis rates higher (65/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Celonis and Skan compare on the numbers?
Celonis leads on domain rating (76/100 against 52/100), headcount (3,852 against 266), LinkedIn following (338,028 against 113,623). Skan leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 44/100).
Read the full Celonis review and pricing or the Skan review and pricing. You can also browse other Celonis alternatives we track.