Cellium vs Cisco
Cellium vs Cisco, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cellium is on 38/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
Cellium
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 3/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 11
- headcount growth: +4.2% against -13.0%
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 783
At a glance
| Measure | Cellium | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered cloud-managed wireless infrastructure for reliable, scalable, and secure connectivity. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | WiFi, Edge, Indoor, Telecom Infrastructure | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cellium | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -13.0% | +4.2% |
| Total funding | Not published | $220B |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | 783 | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cellium | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 38/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 3/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cellium | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Khoros |
Cellium vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, Cellium or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cellium and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), domain rating (91/100 against 3/100), headcount (95,924 against 11), headcount growth (+4.2% against -13.0%), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 783).
Read the full Cellium review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other Cellium alternatives we track.