Cellink (now part of BICO) vs Cradle
Cellink (now part of BICO) vs Cradle, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cellink (now part of BICO) is on 36/100 and Cradle on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Cellink (now part of BICO)
- headcount: 778 against 112
- LinkedIn following: 47,249 against 27,926
Cradle
- our overall score: 69/100 against 36/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cellink (now part of BICO) | Cradle |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | BICO Group is a global leader in life science solutions, enabling the bioprinting and analysis of cells, tissues, and organs. | Cradle Bio B.V. is a Dutch, Swiss biotechnology company that develops software using machine learning for protein engineering. It was founded in 2021 and is base |
| Category | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Drug Discovery | Biotech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Drug Discovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Gothenburg, Sweden | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cellink (now part of BICO) | Cradle |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 778 | 112 |
| Total funding | Not published | $102M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 47,249 | 27,926 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cellink (now part of BICO) | Cradle |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 17/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cellink (now part of BICO) | Cradle |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Cellink (now part of BICO) vs Cradle: common questions
Which is better, Cellink (now part of BICO) or Cradle?
On our 0-100 score Cradle rates higher (69/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cellink (now part of BICO) and Cradle compare on the numbers?
Cellink (now part of BICO) leads on headcount (778 against 112), LinkedIn following (47,249 against 27,926). Cradle leads on our overall score (69/100 against 36/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 39/100), domain rating (53/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Cellink (now part of BICO) review and pricing or the Cradle review and pricing. You can also browse other Cellink (now part of BICO) alternatives we track.