CellCentric vs Earendil Labs
CellCentric vs Earendil Labs, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CellCentric is on 60/100 and Earendil Labs on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CellCentric
- our overall score: 60/100 against 56/100
Earendil Labs
- funding raised: $787M against $375M
At a glance
| Measure | CellCentric | Earendil Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A clinical-stage biotechnology company developing inobrodib as a first-in-class, oral p300/CBP inhibitor for the treatment of multiple myeloma. | Earendil Labs is an AI biotechnology company focused on leveraging artificial intelligence for drug discovery and development of next-generation biologics. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Pharmaceuticals, Healthcare, Biotech | Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Drug Discovery, Pharmaceuticals |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2003 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, United Kingdom | Beijing, China |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CellCentric | Earendil Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | Not published |
| Total funding | $375M | $787M |
| Latest round | Series D | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,695 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CellCentric | Earendil Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CellCentric | Earendil Labs |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
CellCentric vs Earendil Labs: common questions
Which is better, CellCentric or Earendil Labs?
On our 0-100 score CellCentric rates higher (60/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CellCentric and Earendil Labs compare on the numbers?
CellCentric leads on our overall score (60/100 against 56/100). Earendil Labs leads on funding raised ($787M against $375M).
Read the full CellCentric review and pricing or the Earendil Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other CellCentric alternatives we track.