Cellbox Labs vs Thermo Fisher Scientific

Cellbox Labs vs Thermo Fisher Scientific, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cellbox Labs is on 31/100 and Thermo Fisher Scientific on 78/100.

Cellbox LabsCellbox Labs develops and manufactures portable CO2 incubators for the safe and stable transport of living cells and biological materials.
Try Cellbox Labs
Thermo Fisher ScientificGlobal leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing.
Try Thermo Fisher Scientific

Where each one leads

Cellbox Labs

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

Thermo Fisher Scientific

  • our overall score: 78/100 against 31/100
  • funding raised: $5.5B against $17.1M

At a glance

MeasureCellbox LabsThermo Fisher Scientific
What it isCellbox Labs develops and manufactures portable CO2 incubators for the safe and stable transport of living cells and biological materials.Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing.
CategoryBiotech, MedTech, Life Sciences, Laboratory EquipmentLife Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingHardwarePlatform
FoundedNot published1956
HeadquartersHamburg, GermanyWaltham, United States
StatusInactiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureCellbox LabsThermo Fisher Scientific
EmployeesNot published100,104
Total funding$17.1M$5.5B
Latest roundSeedDebt
ValuationNot published$220B
LinkedIn followersNot published2,298,918

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureCellbox LabsThermo Fisher Scientific
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating31/10078/100
Traction33/10060/100
TeamNot published70/100
CommunityNot published15/100
Search visibilityNot published36/100
QualityNot published99/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteNot publishedF (22/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100Not published86/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureCellbox LabsThermo Fisher Scientific
FrameworksNot detectedBootstrap

Cellbox Labs vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: common questions

Which is better, Cellbox Labs or Thermo Fisher Scientific?

On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Cellbox Labs and Thermo Fisher Scientific compare on the numbers?

Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on our overall score (78/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($5.5B against $17.1M).

Read the full Cellbox Labs review and pricing or the Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing. You can also browse other Cellbox Labs alternatives we track.