CellaVision vs Techcyte
CellaVision vs Techcyte, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CellaVision is on 30/100 and Techcyte on 60/100.
Where each one leads
CellaVision
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 250 against 122
- LinkedIn following: 19,143 against 3,668
Techcyte
- our overall score: 60/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | CellaVision | Techcyte |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven digital hematology microscopy for clinical labs. | AI-powered digital diagnostics for anatomic and clinical pathology. |
| Category | Medical Imaging, Healthcare AI, Hematology, Deep Learning | Artificial Intelligence, HealthTech, Biotechnology, Diagnostics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Software |
| Founded | 1994 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Lund, Sweden | Orem, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CellaVision | Techcyte |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 250 | 122 |
| Total funding | Not published | $46.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,143 | 3,668 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CellaVision | Techcyte |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CellaVision | Techcyte |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
CellaVision vs Techcyte: common questions
Which is better, CellaVision or Techcyte?
On our 0-100 score Techcyte rates higher (60/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CellaVision and Techcyte compare on the numbers?
CellaVision leads on agent readiness (35/100 against 21/100), domain rating (49/100 against 39/100), headcount (250 against 122), LinkedIn following (19,143 against 3,668). Techcyte leads on our overall score (60/100 against 30/100).
Read the full CellaVision review and pricing or the Techcyte review and pricing. You can also browse other CellaVision alternatives we track.