CellaVision vs Scopio Labs
CellaVision vs Scopio Labs, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CellaVision is on 30/100 and Scopio Labs on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CellaVision
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 250 against 163
Scopio Labs
- our overall score: 61/100 against 30/100
- LinkedIn following: 29,818 against 19,143
At a glance
| Measure | CellaVision | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven digital hematology microscopy for clinical labs. | Scopio Labs transforms cell morphology analysis with fully digital platforms and diagnostic support for faster, more accurate disease detection. |
| Category | Medical Imaging, Healthcare AI, Hematology, Deep Learning | Healthcare, Diagnostics, Computational Microscopes, Medical Imaging |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 1994 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Lund, Sweden | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CellaVision | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 250 | 163 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.8% |
| Total funding | Not published | $125M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,143 | 29,818 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CellaVision | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CellaVision | Scopio Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
CellaVision vs Scopio Labs: common questions
Which is better, CellaVision or Scopio Labs?
On our 0-100 score Scopio Labs rates higher (61/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CellaVision and Scopio Labs compare on the numbers?
CellaVision leads on agent readiness (35/100 against 21/100), domain rating (49/100 against 37/100), headcount (250 against 163). Scopio Labs leads on our overall score (61/100 against 30/100), LinkedIn following (29,818 against 19,143).
Read the full CellaVision review and pricing or the Scopio Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other CellaVision alternatives we track.