CellaVision vs MedHub-AI
CellaVision vs MedHub-AI, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CellaVision is on 30/100 and MedHub-AI on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CellaVision
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 250 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 19,143 against 2,597
MedHub-AI
- our overall score: 53/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | CellaVision | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven digital hematology microscopy for clinical labs. | MedHub-AI develops an AI-based decision support system for interventional cardiologists to enable precision cardiac care. |
| Category | Medical Imaging, Healthcare AI, Hematology, Deep Learning | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Decision Making, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Software |
| Founded | 1994 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Lund, Sweden | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CellaVision | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 250 | 13 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $3.1M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,143 | 2,597 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CellaVision | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CellaVision | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
CellaVision vs MedHub-AI: common questions
Which is better, CellaVision or MedHub-AI?
On our 0-100 score MedHub-AI rates higher (53/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CellaVision and MedHub-AI compare on the numbers?
CellaVision leads on agent readiness (35/100 against 30/100), domain rating (49/100 against 12/100), headcount (250 against 13), LinkedIn following (19,143 against 2,597). MedHub-AI leads on our overall score (53/100 against 30/100).
Read the full CellaVision review and pricing or the MedHub-AI review and pricing. You can also browse other CellaVision alternatives we track.