CellaVision vs Magentiq Eye
CellaVision vs Magentiq Eye, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CellaVision is on 30/100 and Magentiq Eye on 47/100.
Where each one leads
CellaVision
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 250 against 27
- LinkedIn following: 19,143 against 3,106
Magentiq Eye
- our overall score: 47/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | CellaVision | Magentiq Eye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven digital hematology microscopy for clinical labs. | Magentiq Eye develops AI-powered software for real-time detection of suspicious areas during endoscopic medical exams. |
| Category | Medical Imaging, Healthcare AI, Hematology, Deep Learning | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, MedTech, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Software |
| Founded | 1994 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Lund, Sweden | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CellaVision | Magentiq Eye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 250 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +44.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $200K |
| Latest round | Not published | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,143 | 3,106 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CellaVision | Magentiq Eye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CellaVision | Magentiq Eye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
CellaVision vs Magentiq Eye: common questions
Which is better, CellaVision or Magentiq Eye?
On our 0-100 score Magentiq Eye rates higher (47/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CellaVision and Magentiq Eye compare on the numbers?
CellaVision leads on agent readiness (35/100 against 29/100), domain rating (49/100 against 36/100), headcount (250 against 27), LinkedIn following (19,143 against 3,106). Magentiq Eye leads on our overall score (47/100 against 30/100).
Read the full CellaVision review and pricing or the Magentiq Eye review and pricing. You can also browse other CellaVision alternatives we track.