Cedato vs Sift
Cedato vs Sift, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cedato is on 31/100 and Sift on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Cedato
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- LinkedIn following: 2,913 against 17
Sift
- our overall score: 41/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 2 against 1
At a glance
| Measure | Cedato | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Programmatic video operating system for publishers and advertisers, powering a large video marketplace. | Reduced Real-Time Bidding (RTB) infrastructure costs by filtering low-value impressions using machine learning. |
| Category | Marketing, Programmatic Media, Programmatic Video, AdTech | Marketing, Programmatic Media, Real-Time Bidding, MFG + SUPPLY CHAIN |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cedato | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $4.3M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,913 | 17 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cedato | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 31/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 3/100 | 38/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cedato | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cedato vs Sift: common questions
Which is better, Cedato or Sift?
On our 0-100 score Sift rates higher (41/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cedato and Sift compare on the numbers?
Cedato leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), LinkedIn following (2,913 against 17). Sift leads on our overall score (41/100 against 31/100), headcount (2 against 1).
Read the full Cedato review and pricing or the Sift review and pricing. You can also browse other Cedato alternatives we track.