Cedato vs Pursway
Cedato vs Pursway, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cedato is on 31/100 and Pursway on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Cedato
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 39/100
- headcount growth: -27.7% against -80.3%
- LinkedIn following: 2,913 against 548
Pursway
- our overall score: 51/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 7 against 1
At a glance
| Measure | Cedato | Pursway |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Programmatic video operating system for publishers and advertisers, powering a large video marketplace. | Omnicom Media Group is a global media services company providing media planning, buying, and digital marketing solutions. |
| Category | Marketing, Programmatic Media, Programmatic Video, AdTech | Marketing, Influencer, Advanced Targeting, Media Planning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cedato | Pursway |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 7 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.7% | -80.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $13.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,913 | 548 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cedato | Pursway |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 31/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 3/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cedato | Pursway |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cedato vs Pursway: common questions
Which is better, Cedato or Pursway?
On our 0-100 score Pursway rates higher (51/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cedato and Pursway compare on the numbers?
Cedato leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 39/100), headcount growth (-27.7% against -80.3%), LinkedIn following (2,913 against 548). Pursway leads on our overall score (51/100 against 31/100), headcount (7 against 1).
Read the full Cedato review and pricing or the Pursway review and pricing. You can also browse other Cedato alternatives we track.