Cedato vs Clinch
Cedato vs Clinch, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cedato is on 31/100 and Clinch on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cedato
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Clinch
- our overall score: 55/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 137 against 1
- headcount growth: +51.3% against -27.7%
- LinkedIn following: 4,128 against 2,913
At a glance
| Measure | Cedato | Clinch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Programmatic video operating system for publishers and advertisers, powering a large video marketplace. | Clinch provides an AI-driven personalization and DCO platform for brands and agencies to deliver custom-tailored ad experiences across all channels. |
| Category | Marketing, Programmatic Media, Programmatic Video, AdTech | Marketing, Content, Video, AdTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cedato | Clinch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 137 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.7% | +51.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $13.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,913 | 4,128 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cedato | Clinch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 31/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 3/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cedato | Clinch |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cedato vs Clinch: common questions
Which is better, Cedato or Clinch?
On our 0-100 score Clinch rates higher (55/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cedato and Clinch compare on the numbers?
Clinch leads on our overall score (55/100 against 31/100), headcount (137 against 1), headcount growth (+51.3% against -27.7%), LinkedIn following (4,128 against 2,913).
Read the full Cedato review and pricing or the Clinch review and pricing. You can also browse other Cedato alternatives we track.