CathWorks vs Zsquare
CathWorks vs Zsquare, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CathWorks is on 62/100 and Zsquare on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CathWorks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 28/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 80 against 30
- funding raised: $156M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,341 against 993
Zsquare
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CathWorks | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. | Zsquare develops the world's thinnest, high-resolution micro-endoscopes for various medical applications, enabling disposable and cost-effective procedures. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Endoscopy, 3D |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CathWorks | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 80 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.6% | +5.7% |
| Total funding | $156M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,341 | 993 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CathWorks | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CathWorks | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
CathWorks vs Zsquare: common questions
Which is better, CathWorks or Zsquare?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CathWorks and Zsquare compare on the numbers?
CathWorks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (28/100 against 20/100), headcount (80 against 30), funding raised ($156M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (12,341 against 993).
Read the full CathWorks review and pricing or the Zsquare review and pricing. You can also browse other CathWorks alternatives we track.