CathWorks vs Zebra Medical Vision
CathWorks vs Zebra Medical Vision, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CathWorks is on 62/100 and Zebra Medical Vision on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CathWorks
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 80 against 56
- funding raised: $156M against $50.0M
Zebra Medical Vision
- domain rating: 53/100 against 28/100
At a glance
| Measure | CathWorks | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. | Zebra Medical Vision develops AI-powered medical imaging analysis tools to help radiologists detect and diagnose diseases earlier. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Radiology, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Shefayim, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CathWorks | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 80 | 56 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $156M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,341 | 13,992 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CathWorks | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 17/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CathWorks | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
CathWorks vs Zebra Medical Vision: common questions
Which is better, CathWorks or Zebra Medical Vision?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CathWorks and Zebra Medical Vision compare on the numbers?
CathWorks leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 22/100), headcount (80 against 56), funding raised ($156M against $50.0M). Zebra Medical Vision leads on domain rating (53/100 against 28/100).
Read the full CathWorks review and pricing or the Zebra Medical Vision review and pricing. You can also browse other CathWorks alternatives we track.