CathWorks vs RealView Imaging
CathWorks vs RealView Imaging, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CathWorks is on 62/100 and RealView Imaging on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CathWorks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 80 against 20
- funding raised: $156M against $25.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,341 against 1,945
RealView Imaging
- headcount growth: +13.9% against +5.6%
At a glance
| Measure | CathWorks | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. | Pioneering interactive live holography for medical imaging applications, providing physicians with a unique natural user experience. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech | Healthcare, Hologram, Augmented Reality (AR), 3D |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2003 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Yokneam Illit, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CathWorks | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 80 | 20 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.6% | +13.9% |
| Total funding | $156M | $25.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,341 | 1,945 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CathWorks | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CathWorks | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CathWorks | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Israeli startup RealView Imaging is using three-dimensional holographic imaging to revolutionise medical training.”r/Futurology
CathWorks vs RealView Imaging: common questions
Which is better, CathWorks or RealView Imaging?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CathWorks and RealView Imaging compare on the numbers?
CathWorks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 30/100), headcount (80 against 20), funding raised ($156M against $25.0M), LinkedIn following (12,341 against 1,945). RealView Imaging leads on headcount growth (+13.9% against +5.6%).
What do real users say about CathWorks and RealView Imaging?
RealView Imaging: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Futurology.
Read the full CathWorks review and pricing or the RealView Imaging review and pricing. You can also browse other CathWorks alternatives we track.